Committee for Skeptical Inquiry |
| » Home » Contact CSI » Search: |
Skeptical Inquirer
Skeptical Briefs
CSISpecial Features
Web ColumnsCenter for InquiryResources |
Scooby-Doo, How Could You?Tim Madigan
Way back when, in the June 1994 issue of this newsletter, I wrote an article
titled "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You?," in which I argued that the long-popular
Hanna Barbara talking dog should be the official mascot of Skeptical
Briefs. Scooby and his friends, the members of Mystery, Inc.,travel
around the country investigating paranormal claims. Invariably, they manage to
show that these claims are perpetrated by scoundrels who are deliberately using
spooky tactics in order to gain money or goods. The gang puts things right,
usually by pulling off a monster mask from the face of a minor character
introduced earlier in the episode. In the article I discussed the book
Scooby-Doo in the Haunted House, wherein the gang discovers that
the ghost of a long-dead pirate causing the haunting in question is actually
the homeowner's sister, who is trying to frighten him away so that she can take
over and then sell his beloved abode. My article was written before the recent revival of interest in all things Scooby. Ever since the Cartoon Network began showing old episodes several times a day, a whole new generation of Scooby fans have emerged, and he and his cronies Shaggy, Fred, Daphne and Velma have become modern-day icons. Everywhere one goes, merchandise related to the show - from coffee mugs to underwear - can be found, usually with Scooby's befuddled face emblazoned thereon.
Alas, Ben and I were stunned, shocked and appalled to find out that the entire thrust of the show has been changed. No longer do the intrepid investigators prove that the paranormal is all a ruse. In their latest incarnation, Daphne is now a TV reporter for an Entertainment Tonight-type show. She goes to New Orleans to look into reported hauntings, bringing her old friends along. She and the other members are once again beset by a ghost of a pirate, as well as assorted zombies, werewolves and vampires. But this time, when Fred and Velma present possible rational explanations for the weird events, they are pooh-poohed by Daphne, who goes so far as to tell Fred "you're not a skeptic, you're in denial." When Velma suggests that these horrifying apparitions are really humans behind masks, she is ridiculed. Obviously the new storywriters are parodying the show's past, but at what expense? At the end, we see that there really are ghosts, zombies, werewolves and vampires running amok. It's all such a sad betrayal of the original show's glorious skeptical tradition. After shedding a few bitter tears, Ben and I agreed that at least Scooby and Shaggy remain true to character-cowardly gluttons reliving the old "feet-do-your-stuff" tradition of 1930s comedies. Perhaps with this bedrock of tradition remaining there is still hope for the Scooby-Doo cartoon series to redeem itself and go back to its skeptical roots. But then, I guess I'm in denial. Scooby-Doo, how could you?
About the AuthorTim Madigan proudly drinks coffee from a Scooby-Doo mug and has been known to wear Scooby-Doo briefs on appropriate occasions.Related Information
|
|
|
Content copyright by CSI or the respective copyright holders. Do not redistribute without obtaining permission.
Feedback | Reverse links for this page | Translate this page |
||