Committee for Skeptical Inquiry |
| » Home » Contact CSI » Search: |
Skeptical Inquirer
Skeptical Briefs
CSISpecial Features
Web ColumnsCenter for InquiryResources |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Index] The "Psychic" Parrot & Best Kept Secrets
Psychic Parrot The Monday, February 12, 2001, edition of USA Today featured a story on page 9D about a Congo African gray parrot named N'kisi. The parrot's owner, Aimee Morgana, and British parapsychologist Rupert Sheldrake both claim that the bird is demonstrating psychic abilities. According to the USA Today article, Morgana first suspected N'kisi's alleged abilities while she was admiring an "explicit" picture in the Village Voice personal ads. From the cage across the room, N'kisi crowed "Oh, look at the pretty naked body." This incident led her to believe that there was something much more unusual about the parrot than its mere appreciation of the human form. Morgana, a 42-year-old production designer who lives in Manhattan, read Sheldrake's 1999 book, Dogs That Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home and Other Unexplained Powers of Animals, which convinced her to contact the author about her talented pet. As a result, Sheldrake collaborated with Morgana in a "double-blind" test of N'kisi. The British researcher's web site (www.sheldrake.org) has a special "N'kisi Project" section devoted to this investigation, described as "... a series of controlled experiments and ongoing research in interspecies communication and telepathy, conducted by Aimee Morgana and her language-using parrot. With the collaboration and support of Dr. Rupert Sheldrake." On the web site Sheldrake states that "The experiments were conducted at N'kisi's home over 6 weeks, and consisted of Aimee looking at photographs depicting items from N'kisi's unedited keyword vocabulary that had been prepared, sealed in envelopes, and randomized by a third party. This was filmed as it took place in an enclosed room on a different floor, with no possible line of sight for any 'cueing', while a separate time-synchronized camera automatically filmed N'kisi in her cage to record her [vocal] reactions." A total of 78 images were viewed in 26 test sessions. Sheldrake claims "hits" ("vocalization of target keywords or accurate descriptive phrases") for 32 images in these sessions. The other of images elicited "few" misses, which Sheldrake distinguishes from "no scorable response." Sheldrake also states that there were "[c]omments omitted in editing these segments for time [that] consisted of attempts at contact and other mundane remarks irrelevant for scoring purposes." Both in the USA Today article and on his site Sheldrake is cited making the assertion that the probability is one in a BILLION of their results were due to chance. I have inquired about obtaining a video of these trials (preferably unedited) or a transcript. We are eagerly anticipating a response. The USA Today story was disappointing, even disturbing. It was an uncritical and unbalanced report on Rupert Sheldrake's claims about psychic abilities in pets. The article states that Sheldrake's work "has been met with skepticism among some scientists" (italics mine). This statement leads CSICOP to wonder exactly which scientists comprise the assumed majority actually convinced by Sheldrake's claims. Totally lacking in the article is any recognition that mainstream scientists aren't merely disputing Sheldrake's results because they're controversial. The fact is that other researchers can't seem to replicate them. Conspicuously absent from the story was Sheldrake's previous psychic pet research-namely, his 1994 experiments in England videotaping the behavior of a terrier named "Jaytee" for Austrian television. He concluded that the dog could sense when his owner was coming home through a psychic "connection." Specifically, Sheldrake speculated that animals are guided by "morphic fields" and telepathic influences from their owners. However, Richard Wiseman, Senior Research Fellow in psychology at the University of Hertfordshire in England, tried to reproduce Sheldrake's results by setting up his own videotaped trials of Jaytee. Wiseman, whose findings were published in the British Journal of Psychology (1998), failed to find any evidence that Jaytee had an extrasensory ability to predict his owner's return. Contary to the rhetoric floating around, the field of parapsychology is getting a fair hearing from psychologists like Richard Wiseman and Susan Blackmore in England, and Ray Hyman in the United States. The fact is that despite the hype this field of research continually fails to produce reliable, repeatable results. I've sent a letter to the editors of USA Today stressing these points and hope they'll see fit to publish it. Kevin Christopher Public Relations Director, Skeptical Inquirer kchristopher@centerforinquiry.net
|
|
|
Content copyright by CSI or the respective copyright holders. Do not redistribute without obtaining permission.
Feedback | Reverse links for this page | Translate this page |
||