<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    
    <channel>
    
    <title>Committee for Skeptical Inquiry | Special Articles</title>
    <link>http://www.csicop.org/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2012</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2012-02-08T17:31:27+00:00</dc:date>
    

    <item>
      <title>Committee for Skeptical Inquiry | Skepticism 2.0</title>
	<author>D.J. Grothe</author>
      <link>http://www.csicop.org//si/show/skepticism_2.0</link>
      <guid>http://www.csicop.org//si/show/skepticism_2.0#When:20:19:27Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[
        



			<p>When Carl Sagan, James Randi, Paul Kurtz, Martin Gardner, Ray Hyman, and others came together in the mid-1970s to form the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP, now CSI), did they plan on starting a worldwide grassroots critical-thinking movement? Did they craft a plan to deputize everyday people to speak out in their communities about the prevailing nonsensical ideas of the day? Did they envision young people meeting up regularly to be skeptical together, as in the growing Skeptics in the Pub events in cities across North America and around the world?</p>

<p>I doubt it. These men had the laudable ambition to organize leading thinkers and social critics to respond authoritatively to growing trends of credulity in society: increased belief in the power of psychics, the phenomenon of Uri Geller, UFO beliefs, ancient astronaut theories, popular belief in ghost hauntings and channeling, faith healers and religious charlatans, and the like.</p>

<p>The founders of CSICOP succeeded admirably by many measures: they published magazines and books, spoke out in the entertainment and news media (including on <cite>The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson</cite>, which repeatedly featured CSICOP founders), and convened national and regional conferences for subscribers.</p>

<p>But I submit that they didn&rsquo;t plan a movement from the start. The movement grew organically around the ideas that CSICOP and the <span class="mag">Skeptical Inquirer</span>, and later other skeptical organizations and magazines, promoted.</p>

<p>Within about a decade of the <span class="mag">Skeptical Inquirer</span>&rsquo;s launch, the members of the educated public who subscribed found that it wasn&rsquo;t enough for them to get a magazine about skepticism in the mail four or six times per year. So <br>
CSICOP helped found local skeptical organizations, often at the behest of subscribers in a given area, initially drawing from CSICOP&rsquo;s own magazine subscriber lists. Groups were formed in the Washington, DC, and Los Angeles regions and in a number of other cities around the U.S. and abroad. A movement, not merely a magazine, was beginning to form.</p>

<p>In recent years, new developments in technology and society have allowed this skeptical movement to reach out in new directions, sometimes departing from tested ways of advancing the skeptical outlook that have worked in the past. This is the next generation of skepticism. This is Skepticism 2.0.</p>

<h2>New Media for New Audiences</h2>

<p>Often citing inspiration from the founders of CSI, an &ldquo;average Joe&rdquo; skeptical citizen, possibly without special training or background in skepticism and with the help of only a computer connected to the Internet, can reach out to an audience that the skeptical magazines and organizations never would have reached just a few years ago. Blogs, podcasts, and social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook allow anyone&mdash;including skeptics and believers&mdash;to advance a point of view to the wider public.</p>

<h2>Promise and Problems of Skepticism 2.0</h2>

<p>Podcasts such as the New England Skeptical Society&rsquo;s <cite>Skeptics Guide to the Universe</cite>, online communities such as the one found at the James Randi Educational Foundation&rsquo;s Web site, and blogs such as Rebecca Watson&rsquo;s Skepchick.org shine as examples of Skepticism 2.0, as do amateur skeptical projects such as Tim Farley&rsquo;s WhatstheHarm.net and the growing SkeptiCamp events started by Reed Esau. But local individuals and groups using the Internet to reach out to and inform the public about skepticism can do only so much.</p>

<p>The national organizations, such as CSI, offer an opportunity for inspired local activists and groups to avoid &ldquo;reinventing the wheel&rdquo; and may provide valuable promotional and underwriting support of important new local projects, as well as offer expertise on various skeptical topics (Joe Nickell&rsquo;s work comes to mind). Even more important is the professionalizing of the movement, which the national organizations allow for and encourage. A case in point is skeptical campus outreach: a national organization, with the support of donors and a paid staff, can impact campuses in joint effort with local activists in ways that neither can do alone.</p>

<p>Skepticism&rsquo;s cultural competitors (purveyors of &ldquo;woo woo,&rdquo; as James Randi would call them)&mdash;the New Age movement, alternative medicine hucksters, UFOlogists, etc.&mdash;often draw on the resources and organizational power of national groups devoted to pushing those agendas. The same should be true of the next generation of the skeptical movement, Skepticism 2.0.</p>

<h2>Skeptics in the Pub and the Future of Skepticism</h2>

<p>Over the last few years, fueled primarily by Internet outreach through social networking Web sites, Skeptics in the Pub and similar activities (skeptical meet-ups and Facebook groups, etc.) have cropped up in dozens of cities, often independent of preexisting local or national skeptical organizations.</p>

<p>What happens when these groups grow and their members want to &ldquo;take it to the next level&rdquo;? New local groups are formed with structure, leadership, and programs. Money is raised, membership programs are created, and if all goes well staff is hired and buildings are bought. In other words, new national organizations may grow out of the local and independent projects of Skepticism 2.0. But is that the best path to plot if the movement is to be plotted and planned?</p>

<p>I think a better model is for independent local projects—the successful examples of Skepticism 2.0—to find organizational homes. When they need resources, they should look to the long-standing local and national organizations for support. They should be part of the <em>organized</em> skeptical movement, not outside of and apart from it.</p>




      
      ]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-01T20:19:27+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Committee for Skeptical Inquiry | A Skeptic&#8217;s Guide to Podcasts</title>
	<author>D.J. Grothe</author>
      <link>http://www.csicop.org//si/show/skeptics_guide_to_podcasts</link>
      <guid>http://www.csicop.org//si/show/skeptics_guide_to_podcasts#When:20:19:27Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[
        



			<p>As most of the readers of the <span class="mag">Skeptical Inquirer</span> probably know, podcasts are audio shows that are made available as downloadable digital files, often through free subscription services such as Apple&rsquo;s iTunes. Over the last few years, the podcast has become an exciting medium for skeptics to reach out to new audiences while continuing to educate their existing members. Magazines, books, and television shows are no longer the only ways that people can get their regular fix of critical thinking and skeptical inquiry. </p>

<p>While there are so many great new podcasts promoting skepticism, here is a survey of some of the best and most popular. They vary in length and format: some are very short and feature just one person; others are long-format interview programs. While almost all are free, some require a paid subscription or a fee to listen to its archives. Some of the skeptical podcasts are humorous and involve a lot of banter, and some have specific themes, such as cryptozoology or conspiracy theories. The thing they all have in common is that they reach out to new people with a critical, rational, and scientific point of view toward pseudoscientific and paranormal claims.</p>

<h3>The Conspiracy Skeptic</h3>

<p>Started in late 2007, <cite><a href="http://www.yrad.com/cs/">The Conspiracy Skeptic</a></cite> is hosted by Canadian Karl Mamer, an expert in conspiracy theories. The show focuses on various conspiracy theories, such as those promulgated by Alex Jones about the New World Order, those on the Moon landing hoax, and HIV/AIDS denialists&rsquo; theories that HIV/AIDS is a government plot. He also has had shows about The Illuminati, the Bilderberg Group, vaccine conspiracy theories, and many more. Most shows are about a half hour and feature Mamer speaking on various topics rather than featuring expert guests on a regular basis. </p>

<h3>The Geologic Podcast</h3>

<p>Hosted by musician and comedian George Hrab, <cite><a href="http://www.geologicpodcast.com">The Geologic Podcast</a></cite> features a monologue by Hrab, comedy sketches, and news about general developments in science and skepticism. Hrab doesn&rsquo;t apply his skepticism merely to the paranormal or the pseudoscientific; he often turns a skeptical eye on religion with his regular humorous feature &ldquo;Religious Moron of the Week.&rdquo; This podcast is very funny, often containing adult humor. With episodes running about an hour in length on a weekly basis, this show is a favorite among skeptical podcast lovers. </p>

<h3>The Infidel Guy Show</h3>

<p>Started by trailblazer Reginald Finley in 1999, <cite><a href="http://www.infidelguy.com">The Infidel Guy Show</a></cite> paved the way for Internet audio outreach about skepticism and related subjects. Most shows feature a listener call-in interview with an authority in a given field. While the majority of episodes focus on skepticism of religion and on atheism, many episodes have explored topics more central to the organized skeptical movement&rsquo;s interests: psychics, ghosts, cryptozoology, and the like. Although listening to recent episodes is free, one must become a gold member ($8.50 monthly or $75 annually) to hear most of the episodes from over the last decade.</p>

<h3>Logically Critical</h3>

<p><cite><a href="http://www.logicallycritical.net">Logically Critical</a></cite> was &ldquo;intended to encourage critical thinking in everyday situations without the hassle of checking facts at the library.&rdquo; The podcast ceased production in late 2007, but all previous shows are still archived online and available for free. The show often focused on one theme per episode and featured the host speaking on the topic at hand. Skeptically themed episodes included shows on ghosts, ancient monsters, the power of suggestion, the Law of Attraction, and the best-selling New Age book <cite>The Secret</cite> by Rhonda Byrne. Each episode is about a half hour and still worth a listen.</p>

<h3>Point of Inquiry</h3>

<p>As the host of <cite><a href="http://www.pointofinquiry.org">Point of Inquiry</a></cite>, the weekly podcast of the Center for Inquiry (of which the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry is a vital part), I often assume the role of &ldquo;devil&rsquo;s advocate&rdquo; with my guests. The podcast was founded in late 2006, and almost two hundred episodes are available for free online as well as through iTunes and other podcatchers. While the program frequently focuses on topics in religion, ethics, philosophy, and public policy, it also concentrates on traditionally skeptical topics such as Bigfoot, ghosts, UFOs and alien abduction, pseudoarchaeology, psychic investigation, and alternative medicine in addition to a number of shows on conjuring and its relationship to skepticism. Each episode features a long-form interview with a leading thinker in science, skepticism, or philosophy, and most of the biggest names in the skeptical movement have appeared on the show, including Michael Shermer, James Randi, Joe Nickell, Ray Hyman, and Kendrick Frazer, as well as a number of Nobel Prize-winning scientists and other leading public intellectuals.</p>

<h3>Pseudo Scientists</h3>

<p>The podcast of the Young Australian Skeptics, <cite><a href="http://www.youngausskeptics.com">Pseudo Scientists</a></cite>, has a pronounced fun and youthful vibe. The show begins with an often humorous short audio clip of some purveyor of pseudoscientific nonsense followed by a shout of &ldquo;That&rsquo;s Impossible!&rdquo; It is hosted by Alastair Tait and features Jason Ball (a Center for Inquiry campus leader who recently spoke at CFI&rsquo;s World Congress), Jack Scanlan, Jacqui Williams, Elliot Birch, and others. The podcast airs a couple times a month; each episode is over an hour in length and includes interviews, book reviews, and other segments, including witty banter among the hosts about skepticism and irrational trends in Australia and around the world.</p>

<h3>Quackcast</h3>

<p><cite><a href="http://www.quackcast.com">Quackcast</a></cite>&rsquo;s Web site declares it &ldquo;A podcast review of Quacks, Frauds and Charlatans. Oops. That&rsquo;s not right. That should be Supplements, Complementary and Alternative Medicine i.e. SCAM.&rdquo; Generally running over an hour, each episode features a critical and skeptical exploration of alternative medicine topics, such as herbal remedies, chiropractic, homeopathy, traditional Chinese medicine, acupuncture, Reiki, therapeutic touch, the medical efficacy of prayer, and even questions like &ldquo;can high doses of Vitamin C shorten the duration of the common cold?&rdquo;</p>

<h3>Reality Check Podcast</h3>

<p>Considered a Canadian version of the <cite>Skeptic&rsquo;s Guide to the Universe</cite> (see below), <cite>Reality Check Podcast</cite> is produced by the Ottawa Skeptics and features skeptical banter from some of the group&rsquo;s members, including Jonathan Abrams and Xander Miller. The show focuses on various skeptical topics, such as the Moon landing hoax conspiracy theory, Bigfoot, various alternative medicine claims, pyramidology, and feng shui, and also features regular interviews of some of the leaders in the skeptical movement. <cite>Reality Check</cite>, like many of the other podcasts listed here, is a great example of what independent skeptical groups can accomplish even if they lack the resources of a national skeptical organization. </p>

<h3>The Skeptic Zone</h3>

<p>Sponsored by the organization Australia for Science and Reason, <cite><a href="http://http://skepticzone.tv/">The Skeptic Zone</a></cite> is hosted by Richard Saunders. Each episode generally runs over an hour with multiple segments. Saunders frequently interviews luminaries of the skeptical movement, such as Joe Nickell, and engages in news reports and panel discussions with co-hosts Rachael Dunlop, Joanne Benhamu, and Eran Segev, among others. <cite>The Skeptic Zone</cite> shows how the new medium of podcasting allows for worldwide skeptical outreach with minimal investment relative to print publishing. </p>

<h3>Skepticality</h3>

<p>The skeptical movement owes a lot to &ldquo;Derek and Swoopy,&rdquo; hosts of the first skepticism podcast, which started in April 2005. <cite>Skepticality</cite> is now the official podcast of Michael Shermer&rsquo;s Skeptical Society. In September 2005, Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple Computer, mentioned <cite>Skepticality</cite> during his keynote address about the iTunes music store. On that same day, co-host Derek Colanduno suffered a brain aneurysm. As a result, no new shows were produced until August 2006, after he had recovered, and now episodes appear about twice a month. The shows average an hour and feature interviews with famous skeptics, such as James Randi, Ben Radford, and Joe Nickell, in addition to skeptical and science news and extemporaneous chitchat between the co-hosts. </p>

<h3>The Skeptic&rsquo;s Guide to the Universe</h3>

<p>One of the top skeptical podcasts on iTunes, <cite><a href="http://www.theskepticsguide.org">The Skeptic&rsquo;s Guide to the Universe</a></cite>, is a one-hour weekly talk show produced by the New England Skeptical Society, in association with the James Randi Educational Foundation. It is hosted by Dr. Steven Novella, professor of neurology at Yale University, along with his two brothers, Bob and Jay Novella, Rebecca Watson (founder of skepchick.org), and Evan Bernstein. Each episode features many segments, including a guest interview and a segment called &ldquo;Science or Fiction,&rdquo; in addition to a lot of light and witty conversation. The show covers a broad range of skeptical topics but generally avoids applying skepticism to religious faith claims except during some of the satire and jokes, which are a popular component of the banter among the co-hosts.</p>

<h3>Skeptoid</h3>

<p>Started in October 2006, <cite><a href="http://www.skeptoid.com">Skeptoid</a></cite> is a &ldquo;weekly pro-science, anti-pseudoscience podcast&rdquo; hosted by Brian Dunning. Episodes average about ten minutes in length, and each features Dunning expounding on a topic of interest to skeptics, such as pseudoscientific products and consumer frauds, urban legends, alternative medicine, and conspiracy theories. His short episodes are well-researched, and when taken collectively, very comprehensive. Dunning&rsquo;s podcast is a shining example of what one skeptical activist with a computer, a microphone, and an entrepreneurial spirit can accomplish for the skeptical movement.</p>

<p>Though hardly comprehensive, this list shows the array of skeptical audio that is available for your enjoyment on the Web and on your iPod or other MP3 player. Now more than ever, it is easier for you to share skepticism with those around you by turning them on to these podcasts.</p>




      
      ]]></description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-01T20:19:27+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
